XFoil
- Matt
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2
- Thank you received: 0
14 years 5 months ago #5151
by Matt
XFoil was created by Matt
I am totally excited to find CAE Linux. As a recently graduated engineer, I am impressed to find so much valuable software packaged together into one convenient operating system!
XFoil/AVL on CAELinux 2010 are missing a library file: "xfoil: error while loading shared libraries: libg2c.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory"
I have played with installing libf2c, gfortran, etc... but to no avail.
XFoil/AVL on CAELinux 2010 are missing a library file: "xfoil: error while loading shared libraries: libg2c.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory"
I have played with installing libf2c, gfortran, etc... but to no avail.
- chavagne jean
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 29
- Thank you received: 0
14 years 5 months ago #5153
by chavagne jean
jean
Replied by chavagne jean on topic Re:XFoil
I am a beginner and I use caelinux 2009 (I bought the DVD). first I used java foil but for what i try to find ( lift and drag) avl is more successful for low angle of attack;
There is ,for Computationnal Fluid Dynamics, better think with open foam 1.7 but more complicated.For me
After installation you will automatically switch to ubuntu 10.04 without problem .
Regards
There is ,for Computationnal Fluid Dynamics, better think with open foam 1.7 but more complicated.For me
After installation you will automatically switch to ubuntu 10.04 without problem .
Regards
jean
- Matt
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 2
- Thank you received: 0
14 years 5 months ago #5159
by Matt
Replied by Matt on topic Re:XFoil
I am aware of OpenFOAM. AVL and XFOIL Have the advantage that they are potential flow applications which (at least for me) is great for preliminary design.
They are fast because they simplify the problem, which allows for lots of design iterations early.
I agree OpenFOAM is better, but only in that it is more accurate (and SLOW compared to AVL and XFOIL). Thus, I would like to use OpenFOAM as a last step rather than the first.
If anyone has more experience with linux, and compiling old-school fortran, perhaps they can shed some light on the library error from above. Thank you, it would be appreciated.
I have heard in the past the XFoil and AVL don't compile well unless you use the intel fortran compiler. Could this perhaps be an intel fortan library?
They are fast because they simplify the problem, which allows for lots of design iterations early.
I agree OpenFOAM is better, but only in that it is more accurate (and SLOW compared to AVL and XFOIL). Thus, I would like to use OpenFOAM as a last step rather than the first.
If anyone has more experience with linux, and compiling old-school fortran, perhaps they can shed some light on the library error from above. Thank you, it would be appreciated.
I have heard in the past the XFoil and AVL don't compile well unless you use the intel fortran compiler. Could this perhaps be an intel fortan library?
- Joël Cugnoni
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
14 years 5 months ago #5161
by Joël Cugnoni
Joël Cugnoni - a.k.a admin
www.caelinux.com
Replied by Joël Cugnoni on topic Re:XFoil
Hi,
sorry for this problem; actually, I copied the binaries from previous version but forgot to test before release...
So here is the fix:
1) Avl:
either recompile using the following procedure or replace the existing files with the ones in the following archive caelinux.org/wiki/images/9/97/Avl.tar.gz
[file]
Procedure to recompile:
[code:1]
sudo -i
cd /opt/aero-foils/Avl/eispack
make clean
make
cd ../plotlib
make clean
make
cd ../bin
make clean
make avl
[/code:1]
2) Xfoil:
the simplest way is to install it from the Ubuntu repositories:
sudo apt-get install xfoil
With that you should be able to run the analysis you want !!
Post edited by: Administrator, at: 2011/01/05 10:44<br /><br />Post edited by: Administrator, at: 2011/01/05 11:06
sorry for this problem; actually, I copied the binaries from previous version but forgot to test before release...
So here is the fix:
1) Avl:
either recompile using the following procedure or replace the existing files with the ones in the following archive caelinux.org/wiki/images/9/97/Avl.tar.gz
[file]
Procedure to recompile:
[code:1]
sudo -i
cd /opt/aero-foils/Avl/eispack
make clean
make
cd ../plotlib
make clean
make
cd ../bin
make clean
make avl
[/code:1]
2) Xfoil:
the simplest way is to install it from the Ubuntu repositories:
sudo apt-get install xfoil
With that you should be able to run the analysis you want !!
Post edited by: Administrator, at: 2011/01/05 10:44<br /><br />Post edited by: Administrator, at: 2011/01/05 11:06
Joël Cugnoni - a.k.a admin
www.caelinux.com
- CAVT
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 59
- Thank you received: 1
14 years 5 months ago #5195
by CAVT
Replied by CAVT on topic Re:XFoil
You can also try with QFLR5, it's OSS too and includes the code of XFoil for foil analysis and two other solvers for wing/wing-fuselage configurations, one is a lifting surface approach (same as AVL) and the other is a panel method. It's programmed in either C or C++, cannot recall well, but the results are good.
In case you wish to try MatLab codes that can be ported to Octave with not so much effort, you can use Pablo for foils and Tornado for wing configurations. Pablo is somewhat limited compared to XFoil and JavaFoil.
In case you wish to try MatLab codes that can be ported to Octave with not so much effort, you can use Pablo for foils and Tornado for wing configurations. Pablo is somewhat limited compared to XFoil and JavaFoil.
Moderators: catux
Time to create page: 0.194 seconds