Modal Analysis of Spherical Shell
- sbrockingtonhyperv
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 5
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 3 months ago #3915
by sbrockingtonhyperv
Modal Analysis of Spherical Shell was created by sbrockingtonhyperv
Hello, I have a 9ft dia spherical steel tank with a 0.75 in thick wall. I want to know how its going to ring when i start slamming lots of loud things around it and against it, so i'm attempting modal analysis with CAElinux.
I have the 32 bit CAElinux2008 because my computer is 32 bit but i put the SalomeMecha 4.1.4 standalone pack on it.
I used the geometry tool to make my geometry.
54 dia sphere subtracted from a 54.75 dia sphere at origin=thinshell
thinshell scaled from origin by 25.4 =mmthinshell (thinshell in milimeters)
I then partitioned the mmthinshell with the XY,YZ,and XZ planes to help with meshing.
for meshing
i take my partitioned mmthinshell and did Netgen
1st order
moderate fitness
shell thickness is about 20 units, so i have tried max sidelength from 25 to 150 in making meshes.
yes optimize
which generally makes a mech onthe order of 200k-300k items
in a few minutes.
I switch to code aster module.
Wizards->modal_Analysis
3D->mesh->mmthinshellmesh
i'm in mm scale so for steel properties i'm using
E=2.100e5,NU=0.28,RHO=0.007850
I ask for 33 to 72 modes
I then edit the aster case setting memory to 512k and time to 17000s so they wont be an issue
Heres my problem. I get negative mode frequencies,
and my dominant modes are on the order of 1e-6 so i'm guessing any results i have gotten so far are not physical
NUMERO FREQUENCE (HZ) NORME D'ERREUR
4 2.84054E-07 1.72738E-21
3 -1.05203E-06 1.61798E-20
5 1.38651E-06 4.10544E-20
6 1.79279E-06 5.71857E-20
2 -1.82604E-06 5.71267E-20
1 -2.01754E-06 4.91058E-20
7 5.09970E+00 8.79957E-08
8 5.14657E+00 6.14791E-08
9 5.71300E+00 2.23035E-07
10 5.72267E+00 2.49166E-07
: : :
: : :
i also get this message with negative frequency
LA VALEUR MAXIMALE EST INFERIEURE A LA VALEUR DE CORPS RIGIDE ON LA MODIFIE, ELLE DEVIENT: -3.94784E-03
LA VALEUR DE DECALAGE EN FREQUENCE EST : -1.00000E-02
and i see these
<E><ALGELINE5_15>pour le concept MODES le mode num&#65533;ro 13
de frequence 6.554518 a une norme d'erreur de 0.000006 sup&#65533;rieure au seuil admis 0.000001 Cette erreur sera suivie d'une erreur fatale.
I've run about 30-50 different case over the past week, all crap. any ideas as to what i'm doing wrong?
What additional information do you need? the .comm the .mess?
I see people doing failure mode analysis of support column under load with code aster. Is Salome only good for meshing and post processing results, and the rest is done by manually editing the code aster .comm file?
I have the 32 bit CAElinux2008 because my computer is 32 bit but i put the SalomeMecha 4.1.4 standalone pack on it.
I used the geometry tool to make my geometry.
54 dia sphere subtracted from a 54.75 dia sphere at origin=thinshell
thinshell scaled from origin by 25.4 =mmthinshell (thinshell in milimeters)
I then partitioned the mmthinshell with the XY,YZ,and XZ planes to help with meshing.
for meshing
i take my partitioned mmthinshell and did Netgen
1st order
moderate fitness
shell thickness is about 20 units, so i have tried max sidelength from 25 to 150 in making meshes.
yes optimize
which generally makes a mech onthe order of 200k-300k items
in a few minutes.
I switch to code aster module.
Wizards->modal_Analysis
3D->mesh->mmthinshellmesh
i'm in mm scale so for steel properties i'm using
E=2.100e5,NU=0.28,RHO=0.007850
I ask for 33 to 72 modes
I then edit the aster case setting memory to 512k and time to 17000s so they wont be an issue
Heres my problem. I get negative mode frequencies,
and my dominant modes are on the order of 1e-6 so i'm guessing any results i have gotten so far are not physical
NUMERO FREQUENCE (HZ) NORME D'ERREUR
4 2.84054E-07 1.72738E-21
3 -1.05203E-06 1.61798E-20
5 1.38651E-06 4.10544E-20
6 1.79279E-06 5.71857E-20
2 -1.82604E-06 5.71267E-20
1 -2.01754E-06 4.91058E-20
7 5.09970E+00 8.79957E-08
8 5.14657E+00 6.14791E-08
9 5.71300E+00 2.23035E-07
10 5.72267E+00 2.49166E-07
: : :
: : :
i also get this message with negative frequency
LA VALEUR MAXIMALE EST INFERIEURE A LA VALEUR DE CORPS RIGIDE ON LA MODIFIE, ELLE DEVIENT: -3.94784E-03
LA VALEUR DE DECALAGE EN FREQUENCE EST : -1.00000E-02
and i see these
<E><ALGELINE5_15>pour le concept MODES le mode num&#65533;ro 13
de frequence 6.554518 a une norme d'erreur de 0.000006 sup&#65533;rieure au seuil admis 0.000001 Cette erreur sera suivie d'une erreur fatale.
I've run about 30-50 different case over the past week, all crap. any ideas as to what i'm doing wrong?
What additional information do you need? the .comm the .mess?
I see people doing failure mode analysis of support column under load with code aster. Is Salome only good for meshing and post processing results, and the rest is done by manually editing the code aster .comm file?
- Claus
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 670
- Thank you received: 34
15 years 3 months ago #3916
by Claus
Code_Aster release : STA11.4 on OpenSUSE 12.3 64 bits - EDF/Intel version
Replied by Claus on topic Re:Modal Analysis of Spherical Shell
I really don't have any experience in running modal analyses, but I tried throwing your numbers at Aster, assuming you had your units in check:
[code:1]
VERIFICATION DU SPECTRE DE FREQUENCES (SUITE DE STURM)
LE NOMBRE DE FREQUENCES DANS LA BANDE ( 3.30000E+01, 7.20000E+01) EST 5
VALEUR_MIN EN FREQUENCE EST : 3.30000E+01
VALEUR_MAX EN FREQUENCE EST : 7.20000E+01
LA VALEUR DE DECALAGE EN FREQUENCE EST : 5.60045E+01
INFORMATIONS SUR LE CALCUL DEMANDE:
NOMBRE DE MODES RECHERCHES : 5
LA DIMENSION DE L'ESPACE REDUIT EST : 0
ELLE EST INFERIEURE AU NOMBRE DE MODES, ON LA PREND EGALE A 10
=============================================
= METHODE DE SORENSEN (CODE ARPACK) =
= VERSION : 2.4 =
= DATE : 07/31/96 =
=============================================
NOMBRE DE REDEMARRAGES = 10
NOMBRE DE PRODUITS OP*X = 51
NOMBRE DE PRODUITS B*X = 149
NOMBRE DE REORTHOGONALISATIONS (ETAPE 1) = 39
NOMBRE DE REORTHOGONALISATIONS (ETAPE 2) = 0
NOMBRE DE REDEMARRAGES DU A UN V0 NUL = 0
LES FREQUENCES CALCULEES INF. ET SUP. SONT:
FREQ_INF : 6.79055E+01
FREQ_SUP : 7.00823E+01
CALCUL MODAL: METHODE D'ITERATION SIMULTANEE
METHODE DE SORENSEN
NUMERO FREQUENCE (HZ) NORME D'ERREUR
7 6.79055E+01 2.11120E-10
8 6.79055E+01 2.47016E-10
9 6.98456E+01 7.54419E-10
10 6.98456E+01 6.65166E-10
11 7.00823E+01 1.43167E-09
NORME D'ERREUR MOYENNE: 0.66188E-09
VERIFICATION A POSTERIORI DES MODES
DANS L'INTERVALLE ( 6.77355E+01, 7.02573E+01)
IL Y A BIEN 5 FREQUENCE(S)
[/code:1]---
Does this in any way seem reasonable to you?
In answer to your question about SaloméMECA: yes, it is only good for pre- and postprocessing, in that the wizards only give you a very limited choice in setting up your analysis. BUT! once you've created your analysis, you can right click the .comm file and edit it with Eficas, thus giving you access to the complete range of commands in Aster. More a matter of habit I 'spose but I only use Salomé for pre- and postprocessing and run all my studies from ASTK. Can't wait for the new release of Salomé-MECA (simu-MECA?) though, it does easy the setting up of studies.
/C
[code:1]
VERIFICATION DU SPECTRE DE FREQUENCES (SUITE DE STURM)
LE NOMBRE DE FREQUENCES DANS LA BANDE ( 3.30000E+01, 7.20000E+01) EST 5
VALEUR_MIN EN FREQUENCE EST : 3.30000E+01
VALEUR_MAX EN FREQUENCE EST : 7.20000E+01
LA VALEUR DE DECALAGE EN FREQUENCE EST : 5.60045E+01
INFORMATIONS SUR LE CALCUL DEMANDE:
NOMBRE DE MODES RECHERCHES : 5
LA DIMENSION DE L'ESPACE REDUIT EST : 0
ELLE EST INFERIEURE AU NOMBRE DE MODES, ON LA PREND EGALE A 10
=============================================
= METHODE DE SORENSEN (CODE ARPACK) =
= VERSION : 2.4 =
= DATE : 07/31/96 =
=============================================
NOMBRE DE REDEMARRAGES = 10
NOMBRE DE PRODUITS OP*X = 51
NOMBRE DE PRODUITS B*X = 149
NOMBRE DE REORTHOGONALISATIONS (ETAPE 1) = 39
NOMBRE DE REORTHOGONALISATIONS (ETAPE 2) = 0
NOMBRE DE REDEMARRAGES DU A UN V0 NUL = 0
LES FREQUENCES CALCULEES INF. ET SUP. SONT:
FREQ_INF : 6.79055E+01
FREQ_SUP : 7.00823E+01
CALCUL MODAL: METHODE D'ITERATION SIMULTANEE
METHODE DE SORENSEN
NUMERO FREQUENCE (HZ) NORME D'ERREUR
7 6.79055E+01 2.11120E-10
8 6.79055E+01 2.47016E-10
9 6.98456E+01 7.54419E-10
10 6.98456E+01 6.65166E-10
11 7.00823E+01 1.43167E-09
NORME D'ERREUR MOYENNE: 0.66188E-09
VERIFICATION A POSTERIORI DES MODES
DANS L'INTERVALLE ( 6.77355E+01, 7.02573E+01)
IL Y A BIEN 5 FREQUENCE(S)
[/code:1]---
Does this in any way seem reasonable to you?
In answer to your question about SaloméMECA: yes, it is only good for pre- and postprocessing, in that the wizards only give you a very limited choice in setting up your analysis. BUT! once you've created your analysis, you can right click the .comm file and edit it with Eficas, thus giving you access to the complete range of commands in Aster. More a matter of habit I 'spose but I only use Salomé for pre- and postprocessing and run all my studies from ASTK. Can't wait for the new release of Salomé-MECA (simu-MECA?) though, it does easy the setting up of studies.
/C
Code_Aster release : STA11.4 on OpenSUSE 12.3 64 bits - EDF/Intel version
- sbrockingtonhyperv
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 5
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 3 months ago #3919
by sbrockingtonhyperv
Replied by sbrockingtonhyperv on topic Re:Modal Analysis of Spherical Shell
your 68 Hz seems more reasonable then my 10e-3 hz.
did you have to lock down a face of the model to get those modes or did you leave the sphere in free space? did you load it with gravity?
I made the negative modes disappear by adding a solid 10in dia cylinder protruding a few inches to make a base to give me a flat face that could be anchored. I used 60mm as the max size so elements would be 3x1 with the wall thickness
the comm file is. which is just what the wizard makes with a face locked down. the mesh should be in mm (i'm guessing a 1x1x1 units cube in the geometry module, makes a 1x1x1 same units cube in the mesh module)
[code:1]
DEBUT();
MAIL=LIRE_MAILLAGE(UNITE=20,FORMAT='MED',);
MODELE=AFFE_MODELE(MAILLAGE=MAIL,
AFFE=_F(TOUT='OUI',
PHENOMENE='MECANIQUE',
MODELISATION='3D',),);
ACIER=DEFI_MATERIAU(ELAS=_F(E=2.1e5,
NU=0.28,
RHO=.007850,),);
CHMAT=AFFE_MATERIAU(MAILLAGE=MAIL,
AFFE=_F(TOUT='OUI',
MATER=ACIER,),);
BLOCAGE=AFFE_CHAR_MECA(MODELE=MODELE,
DDL_IMPO=(
_F(GROUP_MA='Group_1',
DX=0,
DY=0,
DZ=0,),),);
MACRO_MATR_ASSE(MODELE=MODELE,
CHAM_MATER=CHMAT,
CHARGE=BLOCAGE,
NUME_DDL=CO('NUMEDDL'),
MATR_ASSE=(_F(MATRICE=CO('RIGIDITE'),
OPTION='RIGI_MECA',),
_F(MATRICE=CO('MASSE'),
OPTION='MASS_MECA',),),);
MODES=MODE_ITER_SIMULT( MATR_A=RIGIDITE,
MATR_B=MASSE,
CALC_FREQ=_F(
OPTION='PLUS_PETITE',
NMAX_FREQ=85,),);
IMPR_RESU(MODELE=MODELE,
FORMAT='MED',
RESU=_F(MAILLAGE=MAIL,
RESULTAT=MODES,
NOM_CHAM='DEPL',),);
FIN();
[/code:1]
but my output looks more like
[code:1]
-- CODE_ASTER -- VERSION D'EXPLOITATION 9.04 --
COPYRIGHT EDF-R&D 1991 - 2008
EXECUTION DU : JE-04-MARS-2010 19:33:45
PLATE-FORME : LOCALHOST
NB MAX PROC OpenMP: 1
SYSTEME : LINUX
CPU : I686
****************snip*******************************
LE NOMBRE DE DDL
TOTAL EST: 108552
DE LAGRANGE EST: 102
LE NOMBRE DE DDL ACTIFS EST: 108399
L'OPTION CHOISIE EST: PLUS_PETITE
LA VALEUR DE DECALAGE EN FREQUENCE EST : 0.00000E+00
INFORMATIONS SUR LE CALCUL DEMANDE:
NOMBRE DE MODES RECHERCHES : 85
LA DIMENSION DE L'ESPACE REDUIT EST : 0
ELLE EST INFERIEURE AU NOMBRE DE MODES, ON LA PREND EGALE A 170
=============================================
= METHODE DE SORENSEN (CODE ARPACK) =
= VERSION : 2.4 =
= DATE : 07/31/96 =
=============================================
NOMBRE DE REDEMARRAGES = 3
NOMBRE DE PRODUITS OP*X = 257
NOMBRE DE PRODUITS B*X = 770
NOMBRE DE REORTHOGONALISATIONS (ETAPE 1) = 255
NOMBRE DE REORTHOGONALISATIONS (ETAPE 2) = 0
NOMBRE DE REDEMARRAGES DU A UN V0 NUL = 0
LES FREQUENCES CALCULEES INF. ET SUP. SONT:
FREQ_INF : 4.12075E-03
FREQ_SUP : 7.96893E-01
CALCUL MODAL: METHODE D'ITERATION SIMULTANEE
METHODE DE SORENSEN
NUMERO FREQUENCE (HZ) NORME D'ERREUR
1 4.12075E-03 6.34139E-10
2 4.13680E-03 5.70143E-10
3 2.02226E-02 2.34509E-08
4 5.78469E-02 6.19203E-10
5 2.38082E-01 9.60725E-10
6 2.38331E-01 4.25963E-10
7 4.41370E-01 1.08905E-09
.
.
.
85 7.96893E-01 1.33681E-09
NORME D'ERREUR MOYENNE: 0.18027E-08
VERIFICATION A POSTERIORI DES MODES
DANS L'INTERVALLE (-1.00250E-02, 7.98883E-01)
IL Y A BIEN 85 FREQUENCE(S)
[/code:1]
mili-hetz seems to low. perhaps i need to run some test cases on models with analytical solutions before i can jump to my desired case.
eficas looks powerful. I take it theres no translations available?
did you have to lock down a face of the model to get those modes or did you leave the sphere in free space? did you load it with gravity?
I made the negative modes disappear by adding a solid 10in dia cylinder protruding a few inches to make a base to give me a flat face that could be anchored. I used 60mm as the max size so elements would be 3x1 with the wall thickness
the comm file is. which is just what the wizard makes with a face locked down. the mesh should be in mm (i'm guessing a 1x1x1 units cube in the geometry module, makes a 1x1x1 same units cube in the mesh module)
[code:1]
DEBUT();
MAIL=LIRE_MAILLAGE(UNITE=20,FORMAT='MED',);
MODELE=AFFE_MODELE(MAILLAGE=MAIL,
AFFE=_F(TOUT='OUI',
PHENOMENE='MECANIQUE',
MODELISATION='3D',),);
ACIER=DEFI_MATERIAU(ELAS=_F(E=2.1e5,
NU=0.28,
RHO=.007850,),);
CHMAT=AFFE_MATERIAU(MAILLAGE=MAIL,
AFFE=_F(TOUT='OUI',
MATER=ACIER,),);
BLOCAGE=AFFE_CHAR_MECA(MODELE=MODELE,
DDL_IMPO=(
_F(GROUP_MA='Group_1',
DX=0,
DY=0,
DZ=0,),),);
MACRO_MATR_ASSE(MODELE=MODELE,
CHAM_MATER=CHMAT,
CHARGE=BLOCAGE,
NUME_DDL=CO('NUMEDDL'),
MATR_ASSE=(_F(MATRICE=CO('RIGIDITE'),
OPTION='RIGI_MECA',),
_F(MATRICE=CO('MASSE'),
OPTION='MASS_MECA',),),);
MODES=MODE_ITER_SIMULT( MATR_A=RIGIDITE,
MATR_B=MASSE,
CALC_FREQ=_F(
OPTION='PLUS_PETITE',
NMAX_FREQ=85,),);
IMPR_RESU(MODELE=MODELE,
FORMAT='MED',
RESU=_F(MAILLAGE=MAIL,
RESULTAT=MODES,
NOM_CHAM='DEPL',),);
FIN();
[/code:1]
but my output looks more like
[code:1]
-- CODE_ASTER -- VERSION D'EXPLOITATION 9.04 --
COPYRIGHT EDF-R&D 1991 - 2008
EXECUTION DU : JE-04-MARS-2010 19:33:45
PLATE-FORME : LOCALHOST
NB MAX PROC OpenMP: 1
SYSTEME : LINUX
CPU : I686
****************snip*******************************
LE NOMBRE DE DDL
TOTAL EST: 108552
DE LAGRANGE EST: 102
LE NOMBRE DE DDL ACTIFS EST: 108399
L'OPTION CHOISIE EST: PLUS_PETITE
LA VALEUR DE DECALAGE EN FREQUENCE EST : 0.00000E+00
INFORMATIONS SUR LE CALCUL DEMANDE:
NOMBRE DE MODES RECHERCHES : 85
LA DIMENSION DE L'ESPACE REDUIT EST : 0
ELLE EST INFERIEURE AU NOMBRE DE MODES, ON LA PREND EGALE A 170
=============================================
= METHODE DE SORENSEN (CODE ARPACK) =
= VERSION : 2.4 =
= DATE : 07/31/96 =
=============================================
NOMBRE DE REDEMARRAGES = 3
NOMBRE DE PRODUITS OP*X = 257
NOMBRE DE PRODUITS B*X = 770
NOMBRE DE REORTHOGONALISATIONS (ETAPE 1) = 255
NOMBRE DE REORTHOGONALISATIONS (ETAPE 2) = 0
NOMBRE DE REDEMARRAGES DU A UN V0 NUL = 0
LES FREQUENCES CALCULEES INF. ET SUP. SONT:
FREQ_INF : 4.12075E-03
FREQ_SUP : 7.96893E-01
CALCUL MODAL: METHODE D'ITERATION SIMULTANEE
METHODE DE SORENSEN
NUMERO FREQUENCE (HZ) NORME D'ERREUR
1 4.12075E-03 6.34139E-10
2 4.13680E-03 5.70143E-10
3 2.02226E-02 2.34509E-08
4 5.78469E-02 6.19203E-10
5 2.38082E-01 9.60725E-10
6 2.38331E-01 4.25963E-10
7 4.41370E-01 1.08905E-09
.
.
.
85 7.96893E-01 1.33681E-09
NORME D'ERREUR MOYENNE: 0.18027E-08
VERIFICATION A POSTERIORI DES MODES
DANS L'INTERVALLE (-1.00250E-02, 7.98883E-01)
IL Y A BIEN 85 FREQUENCE(S)
[/code:1]
mili-hetz seems to low. perhaps i need to run some test cases on models with analytical solutions before i can jump to my desired case.
eficas looks powerful. I take it theres no translations available?
- Claus
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 670
- Thank you received: 34
15 years 3 months ago #3920
by Claus
Code_Aster release : STA11.4 on OpenSUSE 12.3 64 bits - EDF/Intel version
Replied by Claus on topic Re:Modal Analysis of Spherical Shell
I did anchor it down with a single node, afterwards I tried without.
I also changed the thickness, I think I got it wrong the first time. The shell thickness is 0.0650ft?
I did not apply gravity nor model a 'foot' for the sphere and I am using shells instead of 3D volumes.
Again, I don't know that much about modal analyses since I haven't taken that course (yet) so Im just throwing the numbers you give me, at Aster.
Eficas is the way to communicate with Aster, but no, it is not translated, so learning Aster as a whole is quite daunting.
Automated translations of the documentation is underway however - and we have a few people here very willing to help out.
I just realized when I revisited the results, that I swapped diameter for radius
- thus rerunning approx doubles the freqs.
I get the two freqs. of
0.227758
134.872825
But I wouldn't put too much into those results before you have an analytical solution to compare to.
I also changed the thickness, I think I got it wrong the first time. The shell thickness is 0.0650ft?
I did not apply gravity nor model a 'foot' for the sphere and I am using shells instead of 3D volumes.
Again, I don't know that much about modal analyses since I haven't taken that course (yet) so Im just throwing the numbers you give me, at Aster.
Eficas is the way to communicate with Aster, but no, it is not translated, so learning Aster as a whole is quite daunting.
Automated translations of the documentation is underway however - and we have a few people here very willing to help out.
I just realized when I revisited the results, that I swapped diameter for radius

I get the two freqs. of
0.227758
134.872825
But I wouldn't put too much into those results before you have an analytical solution to compare to.
Code_Aster release : STA11.4 on OpenSUSE 12.3 64 bits - EDF/Intel version
- sbrockingtonhyperv
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 5
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 3 months ago #3921
by sbrockingtonhyperv
Replied by sbrockingtonhyperv on topic Re:Modal Analysis of Spherical Shell
okay so anchoring the mesh at at least 1 location is important.
the other thing i noticed is for a beam problem.
Given E and rho and for a small square cross-section beam of length L,
v=sqrt(E/rho) is the soundspeed
and the major mode should be f=v/2L
well if
units of E is (MPa or or 1e6 kg/(ms^2))
units of rho is g/mm^3
and units L is mm
then
v is in units of (1e3 mm/s),
and f is in units of 1e3 1/s or kHz?
so using MPa and mm mesh gets you frequency in kHz?
and PA m mesh would get you hertz?
the other thing i noticed is for a beam problem.
Given E and rho and for a small square cross-section beam of length L,
v=sqrt(E/rho) is the soundspeed
and the major mode should be f=v/2L
well if
units of E is (MPa or or 1e6 kg/(ms^2))
units of rho is g/mm^3
and units L is mm
then
v is in units of (1e3 mm/s),
and f is in units of 1e3 1/s or kHz?
so using MPa and mm mesh gets you frequency in kHz?
and PA m mesh would get you hertz?
- Claus
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
Less
More
- Posts: 670
- Thank you received: 34
15 years 3 months ago #3923
by Claus
Code_Aster release : STA11.4 on OpenSUSE 12.3 64 bits - EDF/Intel version
Replied by Claus on topic Re:Modal Analysis of Spherical Shell
sbrockingtonhyperv wrote:
The thing about Aster *sigh* is that the more you dig, the more you uncover. Im knee deep in something I don't know much about, but I think I've set up a model correctly now, now I just need to figure out how to limit the results. For a band between 33-72 I get 200 or so frequencies.
Using [m],[Pa],[kg/m³] etc. should give you an output of Hz
Assuming a diameter of 2.74m, a thickness of 0.0195m, Rho of 7800kg/m³, one node secured, the first 10 freqs might be:
LES FREQUENCES CALCULEES INF. ET SUP. SONT:
FREQ_INF : 1.07047E-01
FREQ_SUP : 4.60319E+02
CALCUL MODAL: METHODE D'ITERATION SIMULTANEE
METHODE DE SORENSEN
NUMERO FREQUENCE (HZ) NORME D'ERREUR
1 1.07047E-01 3.39877E-04
2 1.23882E-01 5.09590E-04
3 1.81333E-01 1.64054E-03
4 3.06586E+01 1.17330E-07
5 2.16937E+02 5.42066E-06
6 2.18250E+02 3.31591E-06
7 4.44583E+02 7.14064E-07
8 4.44640E+02 1.22635E-06
9 4.47012E+02 8.09875E-07
10 4.60319E+02 1.47543E-06
NORME D'ERREUR MOYENNE: 0.25031E-03
Btw. silly Americans with their silly units, when will they learn?
okay so anchoring the mesh at at least 1 location is important.
the other thing i noticed is for a beam problem.
Given E and rho and for a small square cross-section beam of length L,
v=sqrt(E/rho) is the soundspeed
and the major mode should be f=v/2L
well if
units of E is (MPa or or 1e6 kg/(ms^2))
units of rho is g/mm^3
and units L is mm
then
v is in units of (1e3 mm/s),
and f is in units of 1e3 1/s or kHz?
so using MPa and mm mesh gets you frequency in kHz?
and PA m mesh would get you hertz?
The thing about Aster *sigh* is that the more you dig, the more you uncover. Im knee deep in something I don't know much about, but I think I've set up a model correctly now, now I just need to figure out how to limit the results. For a band between 33-72 I get 200 or so frequencies.
Using [m],[Pa],[kg/m³] etc. should give you an output of Hz
Assuming a diameter of 2.74m, a thickness of 0.0195m, Rho of 7800kg/m³, one node secured, the first 10 freqs might be:
LES FREQUENCES CALCULEES INF. ET SUP. SONT:
FREQ_INF : 1.07047E-01
FREQ_SUP : 4.60319E+02
CALCUL MODAL: METHODE D'ITERATION SIMULTANEE
METHODE DE SORENSEN
NUMERO FREQUENCE (HZ) NORME D'ERREUR
1 1.07047E-01 3.39877E-04
2 1.23882E-01 5.09590E-04
3 1.81333E-01 1.64054E-03
4 3.06586E+01 1.17330E-07
5 2.16937E+02 5.42066E-06
6 2.18250E+02 3.31591E-06
7 4.44583E+02 7.14064E-07
8 4.44640E+02 1.22635E-06
9 4.47012E+02 8.09875E-07
10 4.60319E+02 1.47543E-06
NORME D'ERREUR MOYENNE: 0.25031E-03
Btw. silly Americans with their silly units, when will they learn?

Code_Aster release : STA11.4 on OpenSUSE 12.3 64 bits - EDF/Intel version
Moderators: catux
Time to create page: 0.135 seconds