- Forum
- Public Forums
- Finite Element Modelling - Code_Aster
- Non-constant orientation of orthotropic material
Non-constant orientation of orthotropic material
- Joe Dowsett
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 22
- Thank you received: 0
14 years 7 months ago #4891
by Joe Dowsett
Non-constant orientation of orthotropic material was created by Joe Dowsett
I'm trying to model a curved shaft/handle, made by laminating layers of wood. The layers are aligned but the direction of the grain follows the curve of the shaft. It has non uniform cross section so I believe I need to model it as a solid rather than shell? At the moment I'm modeling it as massif with the material directions constant. Is it possible to specify a changing orientation for the material?
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Joe
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Joe
- Joe Dowsett
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 22
- Thank you received: 0
14 years 7 months ago #4898
by Joe Dowsett
Replied by Joe Dowsett on topic Re:Non-constant orientation of orthotropic material
I've not managed to arrive at a 'proper' solution, so if anyone has any ideas of a better way to model this then I'm still interested.
What I have done is break the shaft into 8 parts and model it as an assembly. Each part covers a curve of 5 degrees so the maximum deviation of the modeled orientation to the actual grain orientation is 2.5 degrees. I don't want to do this repeatedly for each variation of the shaft, but the results are helpful
- the stress distribution between the two models is more or less identical (just one or two concentrations at joins between sections)
- the deformation is much reduced in the model with the multiple material orientations.
As such I plan on continuing to use a single orientation (correct at point of max moment) to check stress levels unless a better method presents itself.
What I have done is break the shaft into 8 parts and model it as an assembly. Each part covers a curve of 5 degrees so the maximum deviation of the modeled orientation to the actual grain orientation is 2.5 degrees. I don't want to do this repeatedly for each variation of the shaft, but the results are helpful
- the stress distribution between the two models is more or less identical (just one or two concentrations at joins between sections)
- the deformation is much reduced in the model with the multiple material orientations.
As such I plan on continuing to use a single orientation (correct at point of max moment) to check stress levels unless a better method presents itself.
Moderators: catux
- Forum
- Public Forums
- Finite Element Modelling - Code_Aster
- Non-constant orientation of orthotropic material
Time to create page: 0.113 seconds