×

Notice

The forum is in read only mode.

Question to Nonlinear Static Syntax

More
13 years 9 months ago #5748 by kwou
Replied by kwou on topic Re:Question to Nonlinear Static Syntax
Basti wrote:

I tried it out with lower pressure (the measure of the units was MPa and i normaly work with Pa, so my pressure was 1,9e8 MPa and not 1,9e8 Pa .... ) and it finally works :)

But I have new questions
the increment of one step is 10 for 4 steps
so we got 40 increments

when I set the pressure to 4.e2 and the "ramp"-function to
0 - 0
t1 - 0.5
t2 - 1.0
t3 - 0.5
t4 - 0

I get additional increments at 20.25 and 20.75. Why?
And the displacement in result of the applying pressure "jumps" in the frame 19 to 20.
I uploaded the Mesh and comm file (the res file is too big), see next post please.


The pressure of 400 returns without problems and pressure set to 500 (next commfile) does not? The problem starts at t=7 or pressure 7/10*500 = 350, just below 400.
Can you check the stress at pressure 500 with a linear analysis? Is it above the yield stress (about 350 (M)Pa) of the specified material?

kind regards - kees<br /><br />Post edited by: Kees Wouters, at: 2011/09/17 19:06

Interest: structural mechanics, solar energy (picture at 'my location' shows too little pv panels)

--
kind regards - kees
More
13 years 9 months ago #5750 by Basti
Replied by Basti on topic Re:Question to Nonlinear Static Syntax
I again think over the problem.
Maybe the calculation gets in trouble because the displacement triggered by the pressure of 500MPa is too big? Epsilon is almost 0.3 then.
More
13 years 9 months ago #5751 by kwou
Replied by kwou on topic Re:Question to Nonlinear Static Syntax
Hoi Basti

....
0.2000, 490,
0.3000, 510,),
INTERPOL='LIN',PROL_DROITE='LINEAIRE',

your stress can go up a bit above 500 MPa maybe (see your definition of the yield curve above). But above 0.3 strain building up stresses becomes harder and harder, probably with a non-converging behaviour.

Kind regards - kees

Interest: structural mechanics, solar energy (picture at 'my location' shows too little pv panels)

--
kind regards - kees
More
13 years 9 months ago #5752 by Basti
Replied by Basti on topic Re:Question to Nonlinear Static Syntax
Yes this will probably be the solution.

Thank you.

I already have the next problems...

The calculation with a pressure load works. I want to take a step ahead.
I want to apply torque etc
I use a single free node, which is connected to the end face with rigid links, where the force/moment applies.


If I start the calculation, I get this error:

! &lt;EXCEPTION&gt; &lt;MODELISA9_74&gt;
!
!
! comportement :VISC_SINH non trouvé

VISC_SINH is an argument of &quot;DEFI_MATERIAU&quot; (u4.43.01)
I don't speak French but I think it is something about viscoelasticity.
I don't want viscoelastic behaviour and I don't know how big the values should be...<br /><br />Post edited by: Basti, at: 2011/09/20 11:30
Attachments:
More
13 years 9 months ago #5753 by Basti
Replied by Basti on topic Re:Question to Nonlinear Static Syntax
The required files

Attachment Daten_3-35ea2f01520d93cb4abd8bbc8f53d46b.gz not found

Attachments:
Moderators: catux
Time to create page: 0.164 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum